Tag Archives: Dmytro Firtash

The Mafia Ruling Ukraine’s Mobs

Organized crime helped Putin grab Crimea, and may open the way for him to take more of Russian-speaking Ukraine.

DONETSK, Ukraine—I was talking to some young black-clad pro-Russian agitators at a checkpoint they’d set up on the outskirts of this city in eastern Ukraine when a shiny black Mercedes pulled up a few yards away. Some of the men from the group walked over and stuck their heads into the car. I couldn’t see who the capo was, couldn’t hear what orders he was giving, but the scene was like something from a movie about the mob. Nobody wanted to say who that was in the car. Nobody wanted to repeat what he’d said.Such scenes are increasingly common in this contested part of Ukraine near the Russian frontier. “Bosses are starting to appear on the fringes of the protests, they are middle-aged, older and better dressed than the younger men who are in the vanguard of the protests,” says Diana Berg, a 34-year-old graphic designer. The grassroots agitation in favor of Russia has become less spontaneous and more focused in recent days.Before and since Russia’s move to annex the Crimea, many who favor the pro-European government in Kiev have argued that these “bosses” might be provocateurs from Russia’s FSB intelligence service or Spetsnaz special forces infiltrated into Ukraine to orchestrate pro-Russian sentiment. But Berg, an organizer of the pro-Ukrainian rally last week where pro-Russian thugs stabbed a student to death, says there’s a different and in some ways more frightening explanation: the ominous hand of organized crime.A public prosecutor, who declined to be named in this article for reasons of personal safety, says local hoodlums are operating among the pro-Russian protests in the restive eastern Ukraine, helping to direct them on the instructions of Kremlin-linked organized crime groups. He points the finger specifically at the notorious Seilem mob, which has been closely tied over the years to ousted Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych, a onetime governor of Donetsk, who is now in exile in the Russian city of Rostov-on-Don.

“We have already seen organized crime working hand-in-hand with the Russians in Crimea,” says the prosecutor. In that breakaway Black Sea peninsula, Moscow helped install former gangland lieutenant Sergei Aksyonov as prime minister, and his background is well known. Aksyonov and his Russian separatist associates share sordid pasts that mix politics, graft and extortion in equal measure and together they helped steer Crimea into the Russian Federation. Police investigations leaked to the Ukrainian press accuse Aksyonov of past involvement in contract killings. Back in January 1996, Aksyonov was himself injured after his car overturned on the Simferopol-Moscow road during a shootout.

“Why should it surprise you,” the prosecutor in Donetsk asks, “if the same dynamic [as in Crimea] is playing out here? … Maybe there are Russian intelligence agents on the ground, but Moscow through crime networks has an army of hoodlums it can use, too.”

The international media were late to pick up on Crimea’s toxic nexus of organized crime, political corruption and politics. But across post-Soviet Ukraine the three have long been regarded as interchangeable and inseparable. And the eastern and southern parts of the country are the worst of all. “Political corruption is ingrained in eastern Ukrainian political culture,” the Jamestown Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, noted in a 2012 study.

The three regions most notorious for the closest relationships between gangsters, oligarchs and politicians—Crimea, Donetsk and Odessa—were the most resistant to the Euro-Maidan revolution that led last month to the ouster of Yanukovych. And now all three regions are at the forefront of the pro-Russian fight-back against the new national leaders in Kiev.

Taras Kuzio, a research associate at the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies at the University of Alberta, who wrote the Jamestown report, says the internal political turmoil in Ukraine should be viewed through the lens of the hand-in-glove relationships between politicians, mobsters and the so-called “red directors,” managers-turned-businessmen who are steeped in the ways of Soviet-style public sector corruption and deal-making.

The red directors also have their protégés: men such as billionaire Dmytro Firtash, the gas-trading mogul who was arrested by Austrian police on suspicion of mob activity earlier this month following Yanukovych ‘s ouster. Nor are the ties limited to the Ukraine. Their tentacles embrace Moscow: Firtash has joint business ventures with Russian billionaire Arkady Rotenburg and his brother, Boris, close friends and judo sparring partners of President Vladimir Putin. The Rotenburg brothers, not coincidentally, are prominent on a U.S. sanctions list announced Thursday by President Barack Obama to target  Putin cronies.

The symbiosis of politics, organized crime and unscrupulousbiznesmeni developed quickly in Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union in much the same way as it did in Russia. The ambitious, the greedy and the powerful lunged for the huge profits that could be made. The state was disintegrating. The big industries – energy, mining and metals – were being privatized, and may the most ruthless man win. “Individuals such as Yanukovych, Aksyonov and their Donetsk and Crimean allies literally fought their way to the top,” says Kuzio. In Donetsk, Yanukovych as governor “integrated former and existing organized criminal leaders into his Party of Regions,” says Kuzio.

In Crimea, “every level of government was criminalized,” according to Viktor Shemchuk, who served for many years as the chief public prosecutor in the region. “It was far from unusual that a parliamentary session in Crimea would start with a minute of silence honoring one of their murdered ‘brothers,’” Shemchuk recalled in a December interview with the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a consortium of investigators and journalists tracking developments throughout Eastern Europe.

Donetsk was no different. A March 2006 cable from the US embassy to the National Security Council – one of several on Ukraine released by WikiLeaks—noted that Yukanovych’s Party of Regions was a “haven for Donetsk-based mobsters and oligarchs” and had commenced an “extreme makeover” with the help and advice of U.S. political consultants, including “veteran K Street political tacticians” from Washington D.C. and a onetime Ronald Reagan operative, “hired to do the nipping and tucking.”

According to the cable, Yanukovych was “tapping the deep pockets of Donetsk clan godfather Rinat Akhmetov.” Now supposedly Ukraine’s wealthiest oligarch, Akhmetov has been keeping a low profile in these early post-Yanukovych days, staying out of the limelight and issuing inoffensive statements on how important it is for everybody to get along.

Another US embassy cable from then-Ambassador William Taylor in September 2007 drilled down on how Yanukovych was centralizing Donetsk crime and political and business corruption in his party – something he would go on to do on an even larger national scale when he was subsequently elected as President in 2010. After Yanukovych became president, according to Ukrainian officials, more than $20 billion of gold reserves may have been embezzled and $37 billion in loans disappeared. In the past three years, they claim, more than $70 billion was moved to offshore accounts from Ukraine’s financial system.

The Americans have sent teams of experts to Kiev to help Ukraine’s interim leaders follow the money. “We are very interested in working with the government to support its investigations of those financial crimes,” U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt told reporters last week, “and we have already, on the ground here in Ukraine, experts from the FBI, the Department of Justice and the Department of Treasury who are working with their Ukrainian counterparts to support the Ukrainian investigation.”

Many of the financial crimes are likely to trail back to Moscow. Yanukovych confidant Firtash (the gas mogul picked up in Austria) admitted during a December 2008 meeting with then-US Ambassador Taylor that he had entered the energy business with the assistance of the notorious Russian crime boss Semyon Mogilevich, who, he said, worked with Kremlin leaders.

“Many Westerners do not understand what Ukraine was like after the break up of the Soviet Union,” Firtash told the ambassador. When a government cannot rule effectively, the country is ruled by “the laws of the streets,” he said.

That’s still the rule. The old order has much to fear from reform and change and will do all it can to preserve its wealth and power—and its best bet for that to happen is to look to Russia.

For precisely that reason, rights campaigners and reformers in Ukraine’s interim government are racing against time to uncover as much of the mob story as possible. An anti-corruption panel headed by Tetyana Chornovol, an investigative journalist who was nearly beaten to death in December for her reporting, is starting in earnest to recover billions of dollars of stolen money and piece together the financial crimes of the Yanukovych regime.

The Daily Beast learned something about these operations first hand when a team from the organized crime police raided a discreet boutique hotel in downtown Kiev where this correspondent was staying.  According to the police the hotel is owned by Eduard Stavitsky, Ukraine’s former energy minister. He is now believed to be in hiding in Russia. The police searched all the rooms looking for any Stavitsky documents and combing through financial records. As one of the investigating officers told me, “We need to move fast before the cover-ups start.”

Case against top prosecutor closed after security chief’s dismissal

Some critics attribute the dismissal of SBU Chief Valentyn Nalyvaichenko to his accusations against prosecutors.

The ecocide case against ex-Deputy Prosecutor General Anatoly Danylenko in connection with a fire at an oil depot near Kyiv has been closed, Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin said on June 19.

The move followed the June 18 dismissal of State Security Service Chief Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, who has accused Danylenko of covering up alleged violations at oil firm BRSM-Nafta, which owns the oil depot, and co-owning it. The company denies any links.

Some critics attribute Nalyvaichenko’s sacking as SBU chief to his criticism of prosecutors.

His dismissal also triggered an uproar over alleged horse-trading at the Verkhovna Rada that led to it and allegations that either Nalyvaichenko or President Petro Poroshenko is linked to exiled tycoon Dmytro Firtash. Corruption accusations have also been made against Nalyvaichenko’s potential replacement Anatoly Hrytsak and other top SBU officials.

The case against Danylenko, who has been at the center of several major corruption scandals, is being halted as critics accuse the Prosecutor General’s Office of failing to investigate any high-profile graft cases.

“We have found out that Danylenko is not a co-owner (of BRSM-Nafta) and has not struck any deals,” Shokin said. “The ecocide case has been closed. It was started without proper grounds. Currently we have no questions for Danylenko.”

At the same time, the SBU cancelled an interrogation of Danylenko scheduled for June 19, UNN reported, citing the security agency.

Nalyvaichenko’s spokesman Markian Lubkivsky said by phone that he attributed his boss’s dismissal to what he described as his crackdown on corruption, including his accusations against Danylenko.

Accusations against Danylenko and his former boss, ex-Prosecutor General Vitaly Yarema, were made after Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said last week that in October the Prosecutor General’s Office halted a criminal case against BRSM-Nafta into the sale of hazardous substances and illegal sales of excisable goods.

The fire at the BRSM-Nafta oil depot that sparked the accusations was called the biggest in Ukraine for half a century. It continued for a week earlier this month and killed six people.

Danylenko was also at the center of a major corruption scandal in September 2014, when Nashi Groshi, an investigative TV project, reported that 140 hectares of land and ponds in Kyiv Oblast had been illegally privatized by a firm that used to be owned by Danylenko’s son Vyacheslav.

Alina Strizhak, a journalist at Nashi Groshi, said then that she and her family had been threatened by an unknown man shortly before the investigation was aired.

Nashi Groshi also reported last year that Vyacheslav Danylenko owned about five hectares of forestland in Kyiv Oblast and that companies linked to Danylenko’s family were running a real estate business in Kyiv.

Yarema said later an internal probe had found no wrongdoing on Danylenko’s part.

Andriy Demartino, a spokesman for the Prosecutor General’s Office, was not available by phone.

The latest scandal about Danylenko coincided with one about alleged backdoor deals reached before Nalyvaichenko’s dismissal.

Sergei Vysotsky, a member of the People’s Front parliamentary faction, confirmed in a Facebook post on June 19 that he had written a message about an alleged agreement between Lviv Mayor and Samopomich party leader Andriy Sadovy and Poroshenko on firing Nalyvaichenko. Vysotsky claimed, however, that the message was referring to a rumor and he had no factual information proving it.

According to a YouTube video of the June 18 Verkhovna Rada session recorded by journalists, Vysotsky texts blogger Karl Volokh on a smartphone:

“(Lviv Mayor and Samopomich leader) Sadovy was given the position of the Lviv prosecutor and the Lviv customs office in exchange for Valentyn (Nalyvaichenko).”

Sadovy referred to Vysotsky’s message as nonsense in a Facebook post on June 18.

Nalyvaichenko’s dismissal also re-ignited the outcry about allegations made in an Austrian court in April by Firtash, who faces racketeering charges in the U.S.

Firtash, an ally of ousted President Viktor Yanukovych, claimed he had met with Poroshenko and Vitali Klitschko, who is now mayor of Kyiv, in Vienna before the May 25 presidential election and reached an agreement with them on getting Poroshenko elected as president. Poroshenko has confirmed that he had met with Firtash but denied the existence of any agreement.

In what was perceived as a veiled threat to Poroshenko and Klitschko, Nalyvaichenko told the Obozrevatel news site in a June 18 interview that all participants of the Vienna meeting would be taken to court in the U.S. and Austria.

The comments followed accusations by Poroshenko Bloc lawmaker Serhiy Leshchenko that Nalyvaichenko is a protégé of Firtash.

The people reportedly being considered as Nalyvaichenko’s replacement have also come under fire.

One of them – SBU Deputy Chief Vasyl Hrytsak, who was appointed as the agency’s acting chief – is in charge of SBU operations in the war zone.

“He’s responsible for smuggling through checkpoints, the trade in war zone permits (for civilians) and coal trains from the Donetsk People’s Republic to Ukraine,” Yegor Firsov, a member of Nalyvaichenko’s UDAR party and the Petro Poroshenko Bloc, wrote in a column for Obozrevatel on June 18.

Poroshenko himself addressed the problem of smuggling on June 18. “Countering smuggling is a direct responsibility of the State Security Service and there is nothing to be proud of. I am very disappointed with that,” he said at a meeting with SBU officials.

Semyon Mogilevich.(RIA Novosti / Alexey Kudenko)

Ihor Kononenko, a Poroshenko Bloc member, defended Hrytsak on June 18, saying that he is “probably the only top SBU official that we have no complaints against.” Hrytsak spends most of his time in the war zone and is in charge of the highly efficient Alfa special forces unit, Kononenko argued.

SBU Deputy Chief Yury Artyukhov, who heads the SBU’s anti-corruption department, is another potential candidate to replace Nalyvaichenko, according to Firsov.

But on June 19 speculation about Artyukhov replacing Nalyvaichenko was effectively refuted by Poroshenko. He asked Hrytsak to prepare documents for firing Artyukhov, as well as SBU deputy chiefs Vitaly Tsyganok and Viktor Yahun, as well as Vasyl Vovk, head of the agency’s main investigative department.

Firsov wrote that “everyone knows that (Artyukhov’s) department covers up all corruption schemes in Ukraine.”

In May Tetiana Chornovol, a People’s Front party lawmaker, accused Artyukhov of running a protection racket for smuggling oil products from the occupied territories to Ukraine jointly with Yanukovych allies.

Earlier this month Chornovol also accused Artyukhov of illegally seizing a car dealership in Kyiv from a U.S. citizen. Artyukhov has admitted at a Rada committee hearing that Gennady Razumei, who reportedly owns the dealership now, is a friend of his, Serhiy Shcherbina, head of the INSIDER Internet news project, wrote on Facebook on June 18.

Shcherbina also said Artyukhov was closely linked to Poroshenko through a network of business interests and common friends one of which recently got the job of aircraft maker Antonov’s president.

Lubkivsky told the Kyiv Post he would not comment on corruption accusations against SBU officials, while SBU spokeswoman Olena Hiklianska was not available by phone.

Ukrainian Security Service Chief Fired

Ukrainian Security Service chief Valentyn Nalyvaychenko has been dismissed, after a vote in the Verkhovna Rada approved the president's suggestion.

Ukraine’s parliament has dismissed the head of the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU), Valentyn Nalyvaychenko.

In a vote at the 450-seat Verkhovna Rada on June 18, 248 lawmakers supported President Petro Poroshenko’s request to fire Nalyvaychenko.

The 49-year-old was appointed three months before Poroshenko was elected in May 2014 and was never seen as a supporter of the head of state.

Ukrainian media reported that Poroshenko recently tried to move him to head the foreign intelligence service.

Nalyvaychenko reportedly refused before launching a political counteroffensive that saw the Prosecutor-General’s Office accused of covering up corruption and illegal money-making schemes operated by its personnel.

Nalyvaychenko’s dismissal comes amid continuing fighting in the country’s east, where government forces have been battling pro-Russian separatists since April 2014.

Ukrainian Parliament voted to resign head of secret service Nalivaychenko. He helped oligarch Dmytro Firtash to repress his opponents in business

​Poroshenko: Ukraine will retake Crimea, strengthen its border with Russia

Ukrainian Prsident Petro Poroshenko gastures as he speaks during the press-conference for domestic and foreign media in Kiev on June 5, 2015. 

Unlike the June 4 state of the nation address, Petro Poroshenko put Crimea front and center at his third news conference as president today on June 5.

Speaking to reporters in Kyiv outdoors during a breezy, sunny afternoon – ex-President Viktor Yushchenko was last president to venture outside to speak to journalists in 2009 – he said Ukraine will maintain diplomatic pressure to keep sanctions imposed on Russia.

Crimea is a “key priority” and making it a part of Ukraine is an “unbelievably difficult task,” he said, explaining its importance and why he didn’t want to “briefly” mention the peninsula during the state of the nation speech.

“We will do everything to return Crimea to Ukraine,” Poroshenko said.

He stressed that the country will continue working with international allies to maintain sanctions on Russia for taking over the peninsula in March 2014. “It is important not to give Russia a chance to break the world’s pro-Ukrainian coalition,” Poroshenko said.

Repeating what he told parliament the previous day, Poroshenko outlined his goal of distributing administrative powers and functions to regional and local governments, the priority of removing prosecutorial immunity from judges and lawmakers, and having open party lists during elections.

Scheduled for Oct. 25, the local elections would be another test for Ukraine’s democracy. They should stabilize the situation in occupied Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, he added. The easternmost region, known as Donbas, will remain a part of Ukraine, he said.

Poroshenko also warned that the number Russian troops positioned in Ukraine and near the country’s border is the highest since August 2014, when one of the bloodiest battles for the strategic city of Ilovaisk took place.

Ukraine’s army was defeated while advancing on the Donetsk Oblast city last summer when thousands of Russian troops, backed by advanced armor and artillery, joined the battle, leading to the first peace agreement in September. Although the Defense Ministry said 108 Ukrainian soldiers were killed, a Newsweek report on the battle stated “hundreds” had died.

Russia started another military offensive two days ago with an assault on the western Donetsk suburb of Maryinka.

At least four Ukrainian servicemen were killed in the battle. Poroshenko cited the attack –complete with Russians using banned tanks, artillery and multiple-rocket launch systems, as additional evidence that Russia is violating the second peace deal brokered in February.

The president said he would do everything possible to accelerate the process of deploying peacekeepers to Donbas.

“A United Nations support office will be opened in Ukraine and their first task will be to study the possibility of deploying peacekeepers,” Poroshenko said.

He also addressed his critics.

He continues to own the Roshen confectionary factory, his largest asset, and a number of other companies in violation of Ukraine’s constitution. Poroshenko said he will transfer his share in Roshen to a trust with Rothschild, a private financial advisory group.

He hired Rothschild to search for potential buyers as well, and the group conducting legal and financial due diligence on his assets. There are obstacles to selling his assets in Russia as the country seized the property of his confectionary factory in Lipetsk.

Poroshenko brushed off the accusations on existing agreements with businessman Dmytro Firtash after he met him and Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko in Vienna before the presidential election in 2014.

As reported, Firtash said during a court hearing in Vienna on April 30 on his extradition to the U.S. that he met with Poroshenko and Vitali Klitschko on the eve of the 2014 presidential election, and that the meeting was his idea and was aimed at preventing the presidency of Batkivschyna Party Leader Yulia Tymoshenko.

“I never denied a brief meeting with Firtash during the presidential election campaign,” Poroshenko says. “But I absolutely deny that there are any confidential agreements disclosed by Firtash. They does not exist,” he said.

Poroshenko also promised to monitor an ambitious construction project started in early September that aims to tighten security along the Russian border, which stretches along 2,295 kilometers.

Dmitry Firtash

Ukraine’s Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk has said defensive structures will include ditches, test-track lanes, vehicle-barrier trenches and optical surveillance towers to detect troop and vehicle movement from the Russian side.

The results so far of the construction weren’t “satisfactory,” according to Poroshenko. However, he said that the project was revised and the problems have been taken into account.

Kyiv Post staff writer Olena Goncharova can be reached at goncharova@kyivpost.com.

Ukraine Risks ‘Feudalization’ As Conflict With Oligarchs Boils Over

The unfolding conflict between Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskiy is a symptomatic and dangerous moment in Ukraine’s post-Soviet history.

And the danger has not passed simply because Kolomoyskiy stepped down as governor of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.

Ukraine is a fathomless tangle of geopolitical, political, and economic interests, as well as a country struggling to break out of the oligarch-state model.

That struggle is being played out against the background of the upheavals within the oligarchy caused by the essentially antioligarchic Maidan protest movement and of the ongoing conflict with Russia.

kolomoisky poroshenko

So what is happening now? Is Kyiv making a serious effort at breaking the oligarchs’ grip over Ukraine? Or is the country in for another round of self-destructive infighting that could produce political and economic disaster?

“Maidan initiated a process of oligarchic restructuring,” says analyst Andriy Zolotaryov of Kyiv’s Third Sector think tank. “Some oligarchs lost influence and a significant part of their wealth. Other oligarchs, on the other hand, despite losses, became stronger, more secure. Ihor Kolomoyskiy was one of the latter. It was a redistribution.”

ukrtransnafta

He adds that it is too early to tell whether Poroshenko is truly committed to “the necessity of the de-oligarchization of Ukraine’s economy and the removal of the oligarchs from political power.”

Kolomoyskiy resigned as Dnipropetrovsk governor on March 24 following a showdown with Poroshenko over control of state oil companies.

Poroshenko accused Kolomoyskiy of using “private militias” to promote his business interests after armed men occupied the Kyiv headquarters of the Ukrnafta oil company on March 22.

Days earlier, other armed men briefly occupied offices of Ukrnafta’s pipeline subsidiary, Ukrtransnafta.

Ukraine’s government was badly weakened by the Maidan protests, which drove President Viktor Yanukovych from power and forced a reshuffling throughout the ruling elites.

But Maidan didn’t break the oligarchic system, as evidenced by the fact that Poroshenko himself is a card-carrying member of the oligarchic club.

Ihor Kolomoyskiy backed the Maidan movement and used his wealth to create several units of volunteer fighters to secure his eastern Dnipropetrovsk region and fight against the separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk.

As Russian journalist Leonid Bershidsky wrote recently for Bloomberg, “Ukraine remains an oligarch-run country plundered for years by a small group of ruthless men.”

“So far, the Ukrainian people have been unable to bring them down,” Bershidsky added.

Kolomoyskiy backed the Maidan movement and used his wealth to create several units of volunteer fighters to secure his eastern Dnipropetrovsk region and fight against the separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk.

This, Zolotaryov says, gives him the conviction that “the government owes him something.”

In addition, Kolomoyskiy controls Ukraine’s most successful bank, PrivatBank, one that is widely considered too big to fail.

“That is why he takes risks,” Kyiv-based journalist and political analyst Vitaliy Portnikov says.

Ukraine: Kolomoisky steps out of shadow, goes on offensive. Kolomoisky on offensive

“Because he thinks there are red lines” his competitors will never cross.

Portnikov, however, doubts whether such red lines really exist.

“All these people — the oligarch club, the current government — have shown many times that they don’t have red lines because they only think 24 hours in advance.”

Rinat Akhmetov, Dmytro Firtash (above), and Viktor Pinchuk continue to control large swathes of the Ukrainian economy.

Rinat Akhmetov, Dmytro Firtash (above), and Viktor Pinchuk continue to control large swathes of the Ukrainian economy.

And Kolomoyskiy is only one piece of this puzzle. Others, like Rinat Akhmetov, Dmytro Firtash, and Viktor Pinchuk continue to control large swathes of the Ukrainian economy.

“The oligarchy is still in control,” says Oleksandr Bondar, the former head of Ukraine’s State Property Fund. “Akhmetov controls the energy sector, the metals industry, and telecoms as well.

Firtash controls the chemicals sector. They continue to wield power and they will continue to blackmail the government. Kolomoyskiy is not the only one doing this.”

Portnikov agrees that Ukraine’s “club of oligarchs” is “trying to do everything they can to preserve the oligarchic state, including by using their political power and media resources.”

Viktor Pinchuk

Meanwhile, any rift that divides Ukraine and weakens the central government plays into Russia’s hands in the ongoing conflict between the two countries.

The flashpoint conflict between Poroshenko and Kolomoyskiy centered around two state oil companies. But Russia’s LUKoil, controlled by oligarch Vagit Alekperov, also has an important interest in those firms.

Paradoxically, Poroshenko must take into account Russian interests in such conflicts, Portnikov says.

“He is in constant peace negotiations with Russia’s political leadership and he knows that whenever matters touch on the business interests of [Russian President] Vladimir Putin and those oligarchs that support him, the position of the Russian president becomes uncompromising.”

Moscow has been pushing for “federalization” in Ukraine — a weaker central government and broad autonomy for the regions, especially the ones with large ethnic Russian and Russian-speaking populations.

The current struggle among the oligarchs and between the oligarchs and the government, Portnikov says, could result in something even worse.

“Instead of the federalization that we have all been so afraid of, we are getting the feudalization of Ukraine,” he says.

It was never realistic to imagine that ending the oligarchic model in Ukraine would be a simple, consensus-based process, analysts say. Particularly if it is played out at a time of a crippling economic crisis and an open conflict with Russia.

“We are losing the chance to reform,” former official Bondar says. “We are being distracted from what is really happening in the economy.

Everyone has forgotten about the banks, about the exchange rate, and everything else that is going on. Instead of focusing on the needs of investors, we have lost their confidence.”

“The hryvnya is being destroyed,” he adds. “I have already said — Putin can relax because our government and our oligarchs will do everything for him.”

Firtash hires US lobbyist to clean his public record

Ukrainian billionaire Dmytro Firtash, who had close ties to ousted President Viktor Yanukovych, was arrested in Austria on a U.S. arrest warrant on March 12, the Interior Ministry of Austria has stated.

Ukrainian billionaire Dmytro Firtash hired U.S. lobbyist firm, Lanny J. Davis & Associates, in an effort to have his legal representatives in the U.S. as well as to correct his media record, according to the lobbyist’s statement registered at the U.S. Department of Justice on June 24.

http://www.fara.gov/docs/6230-Exhibit-AB-20140624-1.pdf

Group DF, Firtash’s parent company that unites his various businesses, did not respond to the Kyiv Post’s emailed questions.

According to the document, Firtash and the company reached agreement in late April after being arrested in Austria in March and shortly afterwards released on travel ban. The businessman was arrested at the request of the FBI on suspicion of involvement in an organized criminal group. The investigation, started in 2006, progressed with an arrest warrant issued by a U.S. district court this year. He is currently in Vienna challenging his extradition to the U.S. in an Austrian court and affirms he is innocent of all charges.

Lanny J. Davis & Associates will provide to Firtash “legal representation on ongoing matters,” “including strategies and services in support of Mr. Firtash’s legal and litigation positions,” reads the registration file. These may also include “correcting the record in media and elsewhere from distortions and inaccuracies” and advising “to assist in legal defense and in correcting the public record.”

The payment for the services will be done through Group DF. The services will cost Group DF $60,000 per month.

In late April, Group DF wired Lanny J. Davis & Associates almost $180,000 in advance payments and in legal fees for its representation, according to the registration statement.

http://www.fara.gov/docs/6230-Registration-Statement-20140624-1.pdf

Lanny J. Davis also recommended Firtash to hire Levick Strategic Communications PR firm for $25,000 a month and Firtash did. According to the document http://www.fara.gov/docs/6230-Registration-Statement-20140624-1.pdf, the PR firm is in charge of preparing and disseminating op-ed pieces in English to newspaper and editors.

Major interests of Firtash’s Group DF are in fertilizer, titanium, gas and banking sectors. Other areas of the group’s operation include real estate, media, agribusiness, soda ash production and energy infrastructure.

Firtash also prominently featured in the WikiLeaks whistleblower website. According to U.S. State Department cables posted on the WikiLeaks website, Firtash acknowledged to a top American diplomat “that he needed, and received, permission from (Semyon) Mogilevich (Russian mafia mob wanted by the FBI) when he established various businesses, but he denied any close relationship to him.”

He is also widely known as a co-owner jointly with Russia’s Gazprom of a controversial gas trader RusUkrEnergo, which supplied natural gas from Russia to Ukraine in 2006-2009. Firtash has always fiercely denied any wrongdoing.

One Of Ukraine’s Richest Men Has Been Arrested In Austria

VIENNA (Reuters) – The Ukrainian businessman arrested in Vienna this week at the request of U.S. authorities is Dmytro Firtash, Austrian government sources said on Thursday. 

Firtash, 48, is one of Ukraine’s richest men, an oligarch whose close links to Russia and involvement in the gas, chemicals, media and banking sectors gave him substantial influence, notably during the administration of recently ousted, Moscow-backed President Viktor Yanukovich.

The Federal Criminal Office, had identified the man taken into custody only as Dmitry F. and said he had been under investigation by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation since 2006.